|
Author
|
Topic: Netbook of Unlawful ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kolvar
Member
Member # 3788
|
posted September 13, 2001 02:34 PM
     
Is this Netbook something to build on?
In case yes, could we contact this person.The pdf-Version of the CUGtCK got one line: Typeset by
Alessandro Baldoni (from the text version by Ole A. Ringdal) Ole was the host of Olik's AD&D Page and was a little bit later involved with some other project. Maybe, he got some information about the "Guide Creator", how the Creator of the CUGtCK called himself. Q: Is Riot Gear the aknowledged leader of this project now? Kolvar
Posts: 245 | From: Bavaria | Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riot Gear
Member
Member # 202
|
posted September 15, 2001 12:31 PM
Here's the rules I came up with (I can't post in nutkinland)
(((WARNING)))(((WARNING)))
This is fairly explicit and potentially very offensive. If you don't want to see rules for sex in DND, then don't scroll down.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
//
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Are you sure you wanna see? If so, scroll down.
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Or the Sourcebook of Unlawful Carnal Knowledge.
Sex : The Rules The basic rules for sex are as follows : 1) Every character has a number of Sexual Resistance Points, or SRP, equal to three times their constitution score. Experiencing pleasureable stimulus decreases your SRP. For an example, standard male/female sex between two partners removes one SRP from both partners each round.
2) When you have 0 or negative SRP, you must roll an orgasm save each round – A will save with a DC equal to 0 – your SRP if you are a male or 40 – your SRP if you are a female. For example, if your SRP equals –10, your Will save DC is 10. Men roll a save to avoid orgasm. (Wizards make better lovers, due to their high Will save.) Women roll a Will check to bring on an orgasm, the DC increasing by 40 with every successful orgasm. Certain skills can alter this somewhat.
3) After an orgasm, a woman suffers no ill effects. However, a man generally goes limp. He can remain hard, suffering no ill effects, if he makes a Fortitude save DC 22. (Fighters make better lovers because of this.) If he fails, he immediately loses his ‘macho’ and cannot regain it for a number of rounds equal to fifty minus his constitution score
4) Specific sexual stimuli do different amounts of SRP ‘damage.’ Sexual Technique (STR for use with wangs or similar instruments, DEX for use in giving pleasure to wangs or similar instruments inside any given orifice; ARMOR CHECK PENALTY) Check : This ability controls how effective you are at causing SRP damage (giving pleasure) and avoiding orgasm (Will save for your Orgasm check). Roll on the following chart.
Check Result / Total SRP Damage per round
-1 or less / -1
0 to 9 / 0
10 to 14 / 1
15 to 19 / 2
20 to 24 / 3
25 to 34 / 4
35 or more / 5
Alternately, this ability may be used to increase a characters Orgasm Save modifier. However, this abilty scales infinitely – To find the bonus, subtract nine from the roll and divide by five, ignoring a negative result. This ability is rolled once every minute to determine how well you can perform or resist for the that minute. [ September 15, 2001: Message edited by: Riot Gear ] -------------------- ------- I love maces, I really do. That crunch noise is just SO satisfying, and the flying shards of bloody bone - Well, that's just icing on the cake. 
Posts: 1536 | From: | Registered: Dec 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
Kolvar
Member
Member # 3788
|
posted September 15, 2001 02:36 PM
So far so good, looks workable and makes sense as far as I can see on first glance. Stamina (Con) and imagination (Wis) are the two factors, that I would have thought of, too.
The thing, I get no good feeling about is, introducing a new kind of "hit points".
Do not misunderstand me, I would do it in my own house-rules and in an add on, that is intendet, to stand alone. But the this work is greater somehow (just a feeling).
And to build something around an ability score is quite unusual for 3e, where everything works with the bonus.
But before I start to complain, I will have a sleep over this.
Just my first impression.[ September 15, 2001: Message edited by: Kolvar ]
Posts: 245 | From: Bavaria | Registered: Apr 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
Riot Gear
Member
Member # 202
|
posted September 15, 2001 03:21 PM
Thanks for the comments, Kolvar. I appreciate the feedback.Do you think you could work on converting the spells in the document to 3e format? -------------------- ------- I love maces, I really do. That crunch noise is just SO satisfying, and the flying shards of bloody bone - Well, that's just icing on the cake.
Posts: 1536 | From: | Registered: Dec 2000 | IP: Logged
|
|
oddjob
Member
Member # 1979
|
posted September 15, 2001 05:49 PM
Hello. I usually lurk, but this is too good to pass up.While I like all the saving throws, the system seems to indicate that Clerics and Druids make the best lovers which seems kinda odd considering that most priests don't get any or are chaste, but no biggie. Have any of you got the PsiHB? Why not make the system more akin to psionic combat, where each form of 'sexual attack' (stimuli) is based on a different ability score. This way, you can have each ability score represent a different style of lovemaking: Str (Forceful/Rough), Dex (Acrobatic/Wild), Con (Tantric), Int (Advanced techniques/Knowledge), Wis (Perceptive/Intuitive), Cha (Imaginative/Gentle). Each of these Stimuli would have a defence (optional use) which would have varying effectiveness against it i.e. the chaste and sheltered princess would be more easily pleased by the wild and acrobatic swashbuckler or something like that. The Stimuli would do temporary ability score damage which healed very quickly. While I think a lot of the material in the original CGtUCK is still good and original, I think a lot of it should be updated to 3e not only in terms of rules but style (like how the PsiHB and MotP have been updated). New material would also be quite cool, think of all the new spells and prestige classes we could think of! Sorry if this sounds like I'm ranting, but I really would like to help out with this. Bye
Posts: 101 | From: London, UK | Registered: Feb 2001 | IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
posted September 07, 2001 08:00 AM
posted September 11, 2001 08:02 AM
